User:Dy1001/sandbox

Article evaluation
My reviewed article is Air quality index:


 * 1) Yes, all information the article provided is related to the article topic. I do not think there is any distractor.
 * 2) Yes. the article is neutral. There is nothing about the individual points from the editor. The editor stated the fact of AQI applied in different countries.
 * 3) I do not think there is any viewpoint that is overrepresented or underrepresented. The editor provided the definition and usage if AQI and also introduced different AQI in different countries.
 * 4) I have checked most citations in the article, and all of the links can work. Even though some information is out of date, all sources support the claims in the article.

Dy1001 (talk) 12:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)