User:Dye29/Electrofuel/Cummin98 Peer Review

The additions to the article efficiently and neutrally convey ideas. I was impressed by the comprehensive nature of the content, especially considering that the technology that Dye29 is improving the Wiki article of is utterly unfamiliar to me. I would not suggest any change, rather, I would encourage you to continue to execute your plans for the article. The most important thing you could do to improve the article would be to continue adding references to bolster your notability and, as aforementioned, continue your planned progress.

In essence, the structure of the article is clear, coverage is balanced, and the content appears to be neutral. There is an apparent lack of sources, however, I assume that will be addressed in the future. Other than that, the sections are well organized and presented well. I believe the section lengths are proportional to their varying levels of importance. The information is straight to the point. I do wonder, however, if the listing of sustainable electricity sources is relevant in the initial part of the article draft.

I do not think I could guess the perspective of the author by reading this article. The information is not connotatively positive or negative. It is a clear reflection of various aspects of the topic of electrofuel.

As aforementioned, I do draw concerns to the references and lack thereof, but again, I am certain it will be addressed with future, continual development. If it stays as is, the article could be unbalanced and lean too heavily on one point of view.

Regardless, you've made great progress - keep up the good work.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)