User:DylanStric/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Solar-powered fan

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it is a c-class article that has been flagged for citations. The lead is short and concise, the opening sentence essentially tells the entire story. I think that there might be some unimportant info in the lead, it also doesn't give a small list of the major topics either. this article is also a small part of a larger clean energy initiative on wikipedia.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead is good overall, I would say that there could be a small list of the major topics added. I think that it could be shortened too because it mentions some needless info that could be included in the content.

The content could be abbreviated more. I believe that the section "Solar Powered Attic fan - gable mounted" could be broken down into more categories such as the mobile aspects of solar fans, and notable solar fan applications.

This article is rather informative and unbiased.

This article is overall rather unimportant and could be summarized in a small subsection of another article, but what's here isn't bad and could just use some small touch ups to make it much better.