User:Dylan Reddish/Abdoulaye Konaté/YogurtBear123 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Dylan Reddish
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Abdoulaye Konaté - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Abdoulaye Konaté - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

(I couldn't find the sandbox draft, so I'm going off the established main Wiki article)

The editor did an excellent job segmenting the article. They sorted out information into, "Group Shows," "Influences," and "Awards," which helps all readers understand the accolades plus history of the artist. On that note, the history of Konate is something that still raises some questions. Besides for place of birth and nationality, there is little information about the life of Konate. There seems to also be not enough commentary about the style of Konate's art. It is said that he studied "painting," but there is little discussion about his techniques. While the details of art production and style lack, the details concerning the influences of Konate don't.

There is proper grammar and syntax in the article, with no changes needed there. The article does well in conveying the general message of what Konate is up to these days, and what he has done in the past. Additionally, the article has multiple references which extended from Konate's solo show links to the topics of his inspiration. I'd say the most important thing for the author to do is to keep adding more and more references. They already have reliable sources, and just need to extend on that. The editor is very neutral, and overall does a great job covering Konate's activity.