User:Dyuke/sandbox

Roman empire
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes. There is nothing that distracted me.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is neutral.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Viewpoints are moderately represented.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links are working perfectly and the sources are supporting the claims.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? There are total of 654 citations, which are mostly linked to reliable sources like peer reviewed journals, books and web sites. Some web sites overrepresented ideas.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?This article is fairly edited by many people and cited to various kinds of links, so i do not think there is more to add to this article. I have not checked every sources, but i did not find any information that is out of date.

Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are two comments; one regarding grammar mistake and other regarding clarification on certain information.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is rated as 'Good Article'. And this article is of interest to multiple Wiki Projects.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? There are not many differences. But the Wikipedia article is evaluated and updated by many people, so the contents are broader than class discussion.

Thessalian League
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AbigailJohnson58/sandbox