User:E8278/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Fortuna

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I picked this article because Roman mythology is interesting to me and I wanted to pick an article about a Roman goddess.

Evaluate the article
While at initial glance the article seems to be lengthy and well-constructed, some parts seemed out of place. The astrology section does not even reference Fortuna herself, and only mentions a part of astrology that happens to share a name. This section feels irrelevant to the rest of the article and does not have any citations to support its information or link it to the goddess. The "Middle Ages and Renaissance" section contains good and relevant information, but some seems to be more appropriate for another section or a subsection for the goddess's depictions in the arts, like the reference to Shakespeare.

Overall, the tone seems to be neutral and does not present much argument, though at times it is a bit casual rather than informative.

While the citations are varied and present a good mix of ancient and modern sources, some links are from questionable blog-style websites that do not seem to be reliable sources as per Wikipedia's guidelines.

The talk page doesn't show much conversation happening, as it is mostly questions being asked and not being answered. There is mention of a few sections that were removed due to the users feeling they were irrelevant to the topic.