User:EBCarleton/Gravel pit/Rosie1470 Peer Review

General info
EBCarleton
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:EBCarleton/Gravel pit
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Gravel pit

Clarity
User added an ample amount of information that will help the reader learn about gravel pits. The article is overall clear and concise, it is easy to read. I believe that it is well written and will contribute the the article adequately.

Structure
The material contributed to the article has been organized into the lead sentence and then the article body, i would included specified subheadings to help improve the structure. For example a good sub heading would be Construction Uses, Structural Uses etc...

Balance Coverage
There isn't a wide range of subheadings and content within the article, but i presume you are still working on it and planning to add more. It appears to be a new/ newish article with only one paragraph so i'd suggest working on beefing the article up more, finding important subheadings to include, etc...

Neutrality
The content added is neutral and doesn't partake in any biases, its goal is to inform the reader on gravel pits. I wouldn't say any viewpoints are being under or over represented, the article is talking about the pits and the gravels structural ability.

Suggestions for Improvement
Few Errors

Aggregates are mined to make concrete, be crushed into construction aggregate, and for other industrial mineral uses.The be crushed part sounds kind of confusing, i would try to reword it differently.

Over all Great progress, i would just continue to work on the structure and add more sub headings and concise citations.