User:ECM0815/Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit/Brb0305 Peer Review

General info
ECM0815
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ECM0815/Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit

Lead

 * New content hasn't been added to the lead yet.
 * Since the lead is already concise, it should be fine staying a similar length so it doesn't become overly detailed for the introduction section.

Content

 * Maybe add more of an introduction into the content to explain where the data comes from an credit the authors by name.
 * Great use of a specific case study to add perspective and examples to the subject.
 * Consider looking for another example to compare and contrast different approaches to Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit in academia.
 * Where is the first sentence being added?

Tone and Balance

 * I don't detect any bias, so the tone and balance are very neutral.

Sources and References

 * I think the citation can go at the end of the paragraph since all of the information is associated with that sources.
 * New source connect with the material and provide good additional information. Source comes from academic peer reviewed journal.
 * Source is very relevant since it was published in the last 3 years.

Organization

 * Maybe consider shortening "Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit" to "IQ" since it's been established in the lead.
 * Good use of parenthesis to make the information easier to follow.
 * Maybe reword "either because" to "due to either"

Overall impressions

 * Great contribution to further explain Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit.
 * If this is an individual section, maybe expand it a little bit to add more detail and examples.
 * Great use of new sources and references to add new perspectives to the topic.