User:ECOLlover/Ecology of Florida/Carter4444 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ECOLlover


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ECOLlover/Ecology of Florida
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Very good work! I'd, first, make sure you remove the "Plan for Flora Subsection" section when you are done. I recognize that this relates to ongoing drafting efforts, but make sure to not leave it in the final draft. Moving through the draft, I would change "Forest Ecology" to an actual header, as opposed to just bolded font. All of the different ecosystems described further down would fall into this category. For these, I would make sure to add sources to all of your ecosystems to give your words credibility, and I would add a colon ":" as part of the bolded titles for the ecosystems.

I see that there are many places where you say "citation needed." The problem with Wikipedia is that in order for an article to be thought of as "good," every claim made needs to be cited. This is because, as far as the reader is concerned, you are just some stranger on the internet. So even though we know that you are educated in the ways of ecology, it is required that we link out to primary source material. This said, the guidelines for this project are somewhat vague, so I wouldn't necessarily worry about it too much. Just do your best!

The writing itself is quite good, though I do recommend proofreading it for grammar errors, particularly the "Human Impacts" section. I recommend you go through and check--they're truly not that big a deal. Lastly, I would seriously just recommend looking over the format of your headers and making sure that they are consistent and everything is organized well. This shouldn't be too hard, just make it look nice. Again, great work! Just clean it up a bit, add in several sources, and you'll be golden!