User:EEEpidemiologist/Hendra virus/Brays.world Peer Review

Lead: The lead was not updated to reflect new content.

Content: The content added is relevant to the topic. There is no reference so I can not tell if the information added is up-to- date. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equality gaps.

Tone and Balance: The content added is neutral, with no claims that appear to be heavily biased towards a particular position. No added information is overrepresented or underrepresented, and it does not attempt to persuade the reader in any way.

Sources and References: There are no sources or reference cited in the draft.

Organization: The content is well written, without any spelling or grammatical errors, and well organized.

Images and Media: I believe the media added does enhance understanding the topic. It is well captioned, however it is not sourced. The table is laid out in a visual appealing way.

Overall Impressions: I believe the content added does improve the article. It adds new information about the topic that wasn't there previously. However, none of the added information was cited. I suggest citing your references!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)