User:EGS009/Evaluate an Article

Lead section.

The lead section does tell what the article is about and a very brief overview of its conclusions. The introduction did not include a description about the animal studies.

Content

The content is relevant but could be slightly out of date. The article is very scientific not much is non reader friendly. They compared animal stress to human stress for comparisons.

Tone

No problems. Article is only informative not really research.

Sources

9 sources and all of them are scholarly. A few articles are 10 years old and older so they could be outdated.

0Which article are you evaluating?
Transgenerational stress inheritance

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)