User:EKF63/Tecumtum/JaPhiDiMi Peer Review

The introduction of the topic is fine. Missing anything beyond that outside of the references provided.

The reference section looks great.

I now see I acted on this too soon out of panic for approaching deadlines. I will check in again next week. JaPhiDiMi (talk) 23:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(EKF63)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)