User:EKing11/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Triple Top Line

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Most of the article is relevant, but it references a few ideas but does not explain or link to them which takes you out of the article
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * This article is very neutral. It's difficult to be biased with so little information
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There are viewpoints that are underrepresented because of the lack of explanation of certain ideas
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links work, however only one leads to a website. That website is legitimate and helps explain one of the terms but the more important references are from a book which makes it more difficult to check the validity of the refrences
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * From what I can tell, the facts are appropriate, reliable, and unbiased. Since the important ones are from a book it makes it a little harder to be sure though
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * The information is fairly up-to-date, however this article could definitely benefit from information added to it
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is no talk page for this article
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article is a stub, it is not a part of any WikiProjects