User:ENorth3/Red Tape/Msociallyaware17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * ENorth3
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ENorth3/Red Tape
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Red tape
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Red tape

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall: The content added intersectional edits to the concept of red tape. Sources were very strong, and I appreciated how edits were applied throughout rather than solely in one section. As discussed, there may be more to add on the "administrative burden" section.

Content


 * Is there missing content that is missing or content that does not belong (Is gender part of the content)?
 * Yes. The additional edits “20th-21st century,” “Red Tape reduction,” and “Administrative burden” add depth to the current article. The previous article did not mention any relation to U.S. administrations or impacts on marginalized communities.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia’s equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? (feminist and intersectional insights)
 * Yes. The new content adds feminist and intersectional perspectives by highlighting research on impacts for marginalized communities.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes. The author did a good job of pointing out what studies say and additional information in a declarative rather than argumentative way.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily toward a particular position? (universal lens)
 * No. The author added facts and findings.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No. Content was neutral.

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary sourced of information? (Empirical/peer reviewed)
 * Yes. The sources came from government and academic institutions.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes. The only dated source was relevant to the claim on the Clinton Administration.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes.