User:EVula/opining/admin recall

Here are my personal requirements to submit to a voluntary administrator recall. I am also open to recall as a bureaucrat. Content here may change at any time.

Please feel free to make comments and suggestions at User talk:EVula/opining/admin recall.

Initial request
Any request that I submit myself to administrator or bureaucrat recall (hereby referred to as just "administrator recall" for simplicity's sake) must highlight no less than three administrative contributions to Wikipedia which the requester feels are abusive or otherwise detrimental in nature. Any editor in good standing may make this request.

Diffs may be no older than six months. Also, there must be some form of dispute resolution for no less than two of the diffs; while I am open to recall, my stepping down should not be "step one" in the event that I make a mistake. No more than one of the diffs may have been used in a previous request for my recall as an administrator.

Requests for voluntary recall should be made on User talk:EVula. Requests made anywhere else are invalid. Requests that do not meet the above criteria are invalid.

Process
Once a valid request has been made, it must be supported by other editors. To make sure I cannot get ganged up on, here are my requirements for mini-consensus:


 * Two editors (non-admins), of the requesting editor's choosing, who are in good standing, and two administrators, also of the requesting editor's choosing.
 * Three editors and/or administrators of my choosing.

Requests to potential supports should not present the evidence, pro or con, for the recall.

The seven editors must be decided upon within a six day time period. If the requesting editor cannot find two editors and two admins to participate in the process, the request is null and void.

Once the seven editors have been chosen, discussion will occur on a subpage in my userspace (to be determined once the request is lodged). Only involved parties may engage in the discussion.

I will trust them to come to a majority rule of whether the provided diffs are evidence of administrator abuse.

If consensus exists
If a majority (4 out of 7) decide that I have been abusive, I will submit a reconfirmation RfA.

Reconfirmation RfA
If the reconfirmation passes (no less than 75% of editors think I should remain an administrator ), I remain an administrator and the recall request is complete.

If the recofirmation fails (less than 75% of editors think I should remain an administrator), I will request the bit change on Meta.

If consensus does not exist
If a majority (4 out of 7) decide that I have not been abusive, the recall request is complete, and I remain an administrator.

Citing these criteria
I may occasionally make modifications to this page, as I see fit, and without notice. Once a valid request is made, subsequent modifications to this page are irrelevant to the recall process until the process is concluded. If citing this page, please use the latest diff, which ensures that no modifications can take place.

Regaining adminship
In the event that I am removed from my position of administrator, I will remain de-sysopped for no less than three months before I may be nominated by another editor for RfA, and no less than six months before self-nominating myself.

I may not request my sysop be restored by a bureaucrat.

RfAs to regain my sysop bit should be treated as if it was my first RfA; that is to say, no deviation from the standards for promotion expected by the community (traditionally held to be 75%).