User:EWLung/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Xiuhcoatl:Talk Page

part of the talk page is discussing a translation of the serpent's name itself the other is discussing an image to include.

The talk page doesn't seem to have been updated since 2017, the most recent revision was in 2018

Meleager (Unknown class)


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Seems relevant over all. Tone of the article could be improved
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Personally I'm not too sure but I think so
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Each claim seems to have a citation
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * I think so

Atalanta (Start Class)


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * It seems to be so, I think some sections can be expanded though
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * For the most part, according to the talk page though this hasn't always been the case and it can be improved
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes, in the barest of sense, There doesn't seem to be a lot of sources for the amount of information given
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Not all of them seem so

The Cowherd and the Weaver Girl


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * For the most part yes, talks about the topic, does not explain or described the myth itself though
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Seems pretty neutral
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Kind of yes
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Most seem to be, or seem to be news articles