User:Eadams20/sandbox

Article evaluation: Safe Humane Chicago

•	Everything in the article is related to the topic. •	The article remains neutral and does not make any biased claims •	Viewpoints from different categories of people could have been used. Although some were listed, it would have been significant to talk about the community’s view since the organization does work within the community •	The links to the citations work. However, some citations are incorrect. For example, when citing a statement made by the Chicago Times, the article cites it to a wiki page about the Times instead of the actual article where the statement was made. •	Besides the issue with citing the newspaper, the article does a good job with referencing information and providing citation for facts presented. Most of the citations came from books when discussing the different accounts of animal cruelty cases. •	Unfortunately, the page is outdated. Safe Humane Chicago has grown over the years and has new programs and initiatives that were not mentioned at all in the article. •	As expected, there is no activity on the talk page, which leads me to believe that there was only one person editing and no one else updated the information on the page. •	The article is not rated and is not a part of any WikiProjects Overall, this article needs to be updated. Everything that is present is not bad, but could use minor edits. More information about the organization is needed to truly inform people of the work that Safe Humane Chicago is doing today.