User:Eadams6/Poydras Street Market/Txulaedu Peer Review

The lead section is lengthy and the structure of the article needs a little bit of work. Try to split up the information into different sections chronologically for a more appealing article. Maybe more images would tie this article together. This article isn't balanced well enough since there are no sections in this article. There is neutral/factual content in the article so it is not biased. The sources look reliable and credible.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)