User:Ealj/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Human rights and climate change

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it was interesting to me. It is about an important legal framework that has been implemented by many organizations. It seemed like a good article that does not have that much content to it yet making it perfect for editing and adding information to it.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section accurately described what it is suppose to. The first sentence concisely summarizes the whole topic, with more detail on the topic as you read. It also briefly touches upon topics that are explored more later in the article. Overall, it is a concise introduction that summarizes the article well. The content of the article is also clear and concise and explains the concept well. However, in the "specific issues" section I do think there is enough detail, especially in the conflict section. The conflict section only mentions that there are 46 conflicts involved and the nature of those conflicts. I think the article can be improved if we expand on that and name a few of the countries involved, and specific examples of the conflicts it has caused. This also goes for the "development section." It only mentions about how climate and development are linked. I think it would be beneficial to expand on that and show how it is linked.

Overall the article is clear and concise, but could use some development.