User:Eamerrill/Media literacy/Brandon Figaro Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Eamerrill


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eamerrill/Media_literacy?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Media literacy

Lead
Hello, Eamerrill. After looking at your article draft, one criticism is that content needs to be added to the Lead section. This particular section needs a lead sentence that consists of new content that will be added to the Media Literacy article. Also, the Lead section needs an introductory sentence that clearly and concisely states what the article's topic is supposed to be. The lead section of your draft also needs to briefly discuss the topics of the sections that come after the lead section. The lead section of your draft needs to include information that is not already in the article.

Content
Your article draft is missing content. The article draft is specifically missing a lead section, the body of the article, and a section for references is also nonexistent. When adding content to your draft, it needs to be relevant content pertaining to media literacy.

Tone and Balance
When adding content to your article draft, it needs to be written in a neutral tone without stating your opinions.

Sources and references
The article draft will need to contain sources. Specifically, the sources of information need to be scholarly journals.

Overall impressions
The article draft has subheadings, but it will be significantly improved by writing sentences of important information underneath the relevant subheadings for the lead section and the body of the article. Also, those sentences of information need to be cited for your sources to appear under the subheading for references.