User:Earthlover36/Coffee production in Ethiopia/Frenchfrylvr Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

earthlover36


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Coffee production in Ethiopia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Coffee production in Ethiopia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

- the lead is good and reflects the most important information about the article. It should include a brief description of the article's major sections like history, production, etc.

Content:

- the draft in the sandbox is good because it updates the article with current climate issues and how they impact coffee production. I also like the addition to the history section because it expands on how coffee spread to the rest of the world.

- the draft content in the sandbox is neutral and not heavily biased toward a particular position

- the draft content is backed up by reliable secondary source of information and the sources are current and they include Ethiopian authors which is important to include Ethiopian voices in an article about coffee in Ethiopia

- content added is concise and makes sense

- when I read coffee production, I thought the article would provide information about how to make coffee from the harvesting of coffee beans to making the coffee drink. I think this could be a brief but interesting section to add.

- overall the added content improve the quality of the article