User:Eb5406a/Helen L. Smits/Jt5826a Peer Review

Lead

The lead is very concise, but I feel like there could be more information. I think that adding some more information would make it look and be more credible.

Content + Organization

I'm really impressed with the amount of information you were able to get in her career section. I think it could be organized a little better though, maybe breaking it up into sections – for example, putting her work for the Clinton administration under its own heading etc etc.

The Childhood & Education and Research sections could use some more hyperlinks (i.e. Medicaid). Additionally, I think it would help to reader to space out the information under the Research sections a little more. A wall of text is not necessarily the most accessible or easiest to read.

Sources

Your sources seem very reliable, but I think you could diversify your sources a bit more. It would be good if you could find a source that went more in depth about published works. I was interested to read more in depth about some of the specifics about her research but I don't think that there could be more information on your page.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Eb5406a


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Eb5406a/Helen L. Smits
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)