User:Eb5406a/Helen L. Smits/KhushiRamnani Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Eb5406a


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Eb5406a/Helen L. Smits


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Reading through the article, the content is relevant, sharp, and concise. The introductory sentence is powerful and allows enough information to be presented to gauge the readers' attention. Considering Smits' direct involvement with healthcare issues, and being awarded for her research publications, this article addresses Wikipedia's equity gaps as her work is rarely discussed despite being a leading woman in health policies. The article is provided with no significant bias, the tone is neutral and the content is distributed evenly amongst each topic. For future reference, I would suggest including more on Smits' agenda with health policy, why does she aim to improve the healthcare system? Are there any philosophical or philanthropical reasons behind her efforts? I would also consider retracting a few lines from the subtopic 'Research', specifically certain quotes and paraphrases that may be considered as plagiarism. It would help to make this subtopic only about the core research projects Smits contributed to. Other than that, the article is well-versed and includes reliable sources that adds to the writer's notability, the links are done well and help provide external information to guide discussions.