User:Eb5406a/Helen L. Smits/Taylormapstone Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Eb5406a


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Eb5406a/Helen L. Smits


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: Your lead is great. It is very concise and adds relevant and well researched information.

Content: The content is great. You all did a great job researching the information and adding relevant and interesting information. The background for Smits's life which includes info about her parents and her education was very well done. You all did a great job on the career section as well which added in a lot of information about Smits's work in healthcare. I also really liked the research and the accomplishments and awards portions added in at the end, as it shows Smits's work throughout her life and how this work aided to her success.

Tone & Balance: The tone was neutral for this article. Great job adding information without skewing the view of the reader.

Sources & References: You all did a great job finding information for your article. There were a bunch of sources which were very reliable and which helped the information be credible. I went through and checked all of you sources and they all worked and seemed very well researched.

Organization: You all had a great organization. The paragraphs flowed really well and each had a great amount of information and cites. The grammar and spelling all seemed great!

Overall Impressions: I think you all did a great job! The amount of information you found on Smits was fairly extensive and you did a great job making sure all of your information was reliable and well researched. I felt that this article was very well done and well thought out. Great job!