User:Ebe123/Admin coaching/AfD

The following is an exercise in closing AfD discussions. Please follow these rules:
 * 1) Indicate your decision (keep, delete, no consensus, merge, redirect, etc.) as well as your reason for making that decision. The reason should not be your personal opinion, but rather your interpretation of the arguments presented in the debate. The reason can be a sentence long for simple matters, or an entire paragraph long for more complex cases.
 * 2) You are allowed to search Google or other websites, but do not check Wikipedia to see if the article exists.
 * 3) Do the exercises in order, as they are arranged in order of difficulty.
 * 4) Remember that AfD is not a vote, but rather a discussion designed to achieve consensus. Therefore, you should give more weight to exceptionally well-reasoned arguments and less weight to mere !votes, arguments based on WP:ATA, SPA's, sockpuppets, etc.

Example

Decision: Delete Reason: Although a headcount shows an equal distribution of keep and delete !votes, the delete !votes are based on the lack of reliable sources and the presence of original research, while many of the keep !votes are based on WP:ILIKEIT.

Aap Kaa Suroor 2 - Ae Himesh Bhai
Decision: Delete Reason: It's clear that the consensus is to delete the article per WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL.
 * CORRECT

Transport Giant
Decision: Keep Reason: The users proven that the game was notable enough and presented sources for it.
 * CORRECT

Simon james morgan
Decision: Delete Reason: The person has been is some sucessful movies but with relativly minor roles so it still fails WP:Entertainer.
 * CORRECT

Readergirlz
Decision: Keep and re-write Reason: Some people showed that notability is there, but the article requires a re-write for becoming less "spamy".
 * CORRECT

Four square regional
Decision: No consensus Reason: There are good reasons to keep and delete so I close this as no consensus.
 * INCORRECT - Despite the paucity of votes, you can clearly see that the rationale for keeping is weak. How can we retain content that "which will never have citations" under WP:V? "Using this page as a holding tank" is not what articles are for; the correct place to make holding tanks is in user subpages.

2009 Lithuania–Russia crisis
Decision: Merge with Lithuania–Russia relations Reason: There was some interesting discussion about merging it, even by delete !voters. Consensus has emerged to move it.
 * OK - It was actually closed as "delete," but "merge" is perfectly fine.

Truth in Numbers
Decision: No consensus Reason: Arguments from both ends that have not reached an agreement for eighter way.
 * CORRECT

Jessica Brooks Grant
Decision: Delete Reason: Fails WP:ENTERTAINER so is not notable.
 * CORRECT - Consider making note of the fact that one of the !voters is a blocked sockpuppet.

Mike Brown (goaltender)
Decision: No consensus Reason: People are about the links were some people say that the subject is notable and the others say no.
 * OK - That's the right call, but could you elaborate on your explanation? Your sentence is ungrammatical.
 * There's some contreversy on the meaning of the links presented, and the notability.

Fledgling Jason Steed
Decision: Delete Reason: No reliable links has been presented to keep this article ( is not reliable)
 * CORRECT

Greece–Jamaica relations (2nd nomination)
Decision: Delete Reason: Notability, as other Nation – Nation Relations articles
 * OK - That is the correct answer. But don't just say "notability," and even more importantly don't compare it to other articles. Could you try again, giving an explanation as to why this particular pair of countries' relations are non-notable?
 * Might I just say that WP:WAX is an essay, and is not a policy. The consensus is that there was no evidence of notability.

Alexis Grace (2nd nomination)
Decision: Delete Reason: The two strong keep !votes are a bit like off-topic.
 * CORRECT