User:Eblokland/Columbite/Megthetrilobiter Peer Review

General info
Eblokland
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eblokland/Columbite?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Columbite

Evaluate the drafted changes
Added content looks relevant and very informative. In-text citations are definitely needed; all information given in the Lead and in "History and entymology" does not have citation. The article is much, much more complete and references a lot of relevant and important information. Writer does not go off-topic and does link back to related information. Images of the mineral, its structure (microscopic, crystal system, etc.), and how it looks when found (when dug out/off the earth) could make it more visually informative. How the mineral is used would also be interesting, especially linking it back to how it is a resource, or related to resource use.