User:Ebullience10/Amores (Ovid)/Bruisingspace01 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Ebullience10
 * User:Ebullience10/Amores (Ovid)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The lead has not been updated.
 * The lead's introductory sentence does a good job of setting up the background for the article.
 * Yes, the lead includes brief summaries of its sections.
 * No it does not.
 * The lead is concise and to the point.

Lead evaluation
I honestly feel like you don't even need to touch your lead! If you feel like you need to spruce it up then you can do that, but it's honestly fine as is.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Great content! I definitely feel as though I understand Amores in a new light without having read it.
 * Yes, everything seems up-to-date.
 * As far as I can tell, you did a really good job covering your bases!
 * The topics addressed do not represent a group that is historically underrepresented.

Content evaluation
Really nice job! Doing an overhaul of content seems like so much work, but you did everything well! What you added definitely elevates the article and will make the reader feel like they're getting as much information as they can from this page.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * You do a good job of maintaining neutrality in your tone.
 * As far as I can tell, you do a good job of remaining unbiased toward a particular viewpoint.
 * Nothing seems to be over or underrepresented.
 * There seems to be nothing that you added that attempts to persuade the reader(s) one way or another.

Tone and balance evaluation
There really isn't much in this article that could be argued one way or another except for a matter of opinion on a certain theme. With this in mind, however, you still do a good job being neutral.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * You have a plethora of secondary sources and that's fantastic! Fantastic researching!
 * Yes!
 * When it comes to history, sometimes the only source information on a certain topic comes to us from 50+ years ago. You do a great job of finding modern sources, and the use of sources that are older is still relevant and weaved in with the newer ones. Good job!
 * You seem to have a wide variety of sources. Nicely done!
 * The links seem to work!

Sources and references evaluation
Really nice job on your sources! I will point out that one of the names for your sources is backwards, and it seems to be source 9 in your list. Other than that, everything looks good!

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content is very easy to read and understand!
 * I couldn't find any errors.
 * The content from the OG article was overhauled and organized differently but in that makes the article better.

Organization evaluation
Fantastic job expanding on what the OG article had! I like how you took what the OG article did and meshed some themes together in a way that makes it easy for the readers to understand.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * There aren't any images in the OG article and what you've done. I'm honestly not sure how images would enhance this article.
 * N/A
 * N/A
 * N/A

Images and media evaluation
If you want to add images to the article, then that's your prerogative. I honestly don't feel as though they are necessary.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The article definitely feels more complete!
 * The content added provides a better understanding of the themes within Amores.
 * I honestly don't think anything needs to be improved.

Overall evaluation
You did a really great job with this article! The content that you added really took the article to the next level and you're going to increase so much knowledge! I can tell you put a lot of research into this and it shows! Keep up the good work!