User:Ec2024/FK1012/Knikritin Peer Review

General info
Ec2024
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ec2024/FK1012
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):FK1012

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the contributions to the article FK1012 were meaningful and relevant. The new content added is relevant to the topic, as it provides additional information regarding FK1012. A new source was added to the article, however the source is slightly outdated. A suggestion would be to include additional information from a more recent publication, however the content is still valuable. The content added is neutral and does not appear biased, and it is easy to read and understand. I believe adding more content to the article with additional sources would further help improve the understanding and relevancy of FK1012.