User:Ecarzon/sandbox

Testing Insert Paragraph. Library of Things: Music at MCPL Twinbrook Branch.

Article Review: Star Spangled Banner
Almost everything was relevant. The only distraction was at the very beginning, where there was a reference to the anthem of the Union of South Africa that didnt' seem to make sense, unless perhaps searches bring it up sometimes?

It was pretty up-to-date, including a couple of sentences about the NFL protests begun by Collin Kapernick. A photo of him might have been nice to include, although they did link to an article about him.

There are references to Fort McHenry and an article about that, it would have been great to incorporate a link to the cool video that plays about the anthem when you visit Fort McHenry.

The article did seem neutral. It described and provided references to organizations who feel the lyrics are racist, and provided some historical context that suggest the lines in question refer to some earlier British actions. The article doesn't come down to either proposition, it describes both positions and provides cites.

I checked several references and they worked. They referenced a lot of other Wikipedia articles on key people. The sources they referenced on the NFL protest seemed to present multiple perspectives and were national news sources like CBS news for instance.

The article is classified as a Level 5- Vital Article in Art. It's a C Class Article. It is under several WikiProjects including US History, Songs, Pritzker Military History, Heraldry and vexillology, and U.S. American Music / Government / History. Some of the active discussions inlcude: two meanings of the anthem, errors (such as who the first publishers were), modified links, which day was the actual first day it was published, and adding 5th and 6th verses discussions. The Talk Page mentions cites to the Wikipedia Article from outside Wikipedia, which I didn't see in any prior articles under the class.

Did the optional activity.