User:EceYeldan0602/Lobata/Chuckkillsbucks Peer Review

General info
EceYeldan0602
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:EceYeldan0602/Lobata:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lobata:
 * Lobata:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hey Ece, upon reviewing your article as well as the edits I can say a lot of what you added was facts. These additions you added are not opinions and clearly add to the depth of this article. This content was relevant and up to date. You have fulfilled the 3 peer review sources, which is part of the requirement for the grade. The article body was informed. My only advice in regard to the body is to turn the bullet points into a body style paragraph. While I can understand why you formatted it this way, I think the paragraph style format is what is recommended. To increase credibility I would potentially add another source. While you have fulfilled the requirement and it may not be necessary, each of your articles are just used for definitions. It might be worth adding a source to display another aspect about them. Overall, I think you did a great job and you should be proud of yourself. The lead is well written and I wouldn't change anything.