User:Echidi/OLES2129

Talk:Rest in peace

Talk:Bernhard Moritz Carl Ludwig Riedel

Featured Article: 'Bone Wars' - Use of objective and factual terms and phrases; no bias towards either Cope or Marsh in relation to who 'won' the wars, discussion of personal disputes is objective - Images have good explanatory caption, spread out evenly across the article to assist with textual understanding - In depth discussion (while also being concise) - Titles were chronologically ordered (appropriate for a historical piece) - Full historical account of the Bone Wars (including a 'Background', 'Personal Dispute' section etc.) and not just description of the actual 'War' itself - Each section is consistent in length (no one section is much more dense than the others)

Week 6

Activity 1;

visual editing https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ahiyapur&action=history

source editing https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_Chicago_Cubs_season&action=history

Week 7

Featured Article; "Don't Stop the Music" (Rihanna song) Don't Stop the Music (Rihanna song)

Source: The Guardian: "Rihanna and Michael Jackson sued by African singer" https://www.theguardian.com/music/2009/feb/04/rihanna-michael-jackson-manu-dibango?INTCMP=SRCH

- The source as a newspaper article (The Guardian) hinders its reliability, however, tone is unbiased.

- The source has produced a wide array of articles, increasing its verifiability.

- Publication date of article is within two years of song release, increasing relevancy.

- Source (especially statistics) is not cited at all, impacting reliability.

- Very short and absent of any detailed information.

- This source supports the article in that it provides information regarding the lawsuit. It is only cited once (for a quote) and is therefore not a major source used in the article's construction.

Week 10: Peer Review activity

Good article: Adelaide

- Great layout, nice lead and detailed contents page

- Info box is extremely helpful and provides a great snapshot of the demographics of Adelaide

- Written in a concise and detailed manner, and presented in a factual, encyclopaedic manner

- Extensive reference list from mostly reliable sources

- Well in line with the WikiProject cities and the template layouts

- Well documented, supported by factual information and reflects expert knowledge

- To a large extent stable, however, in regards to education, values, arts, entertainment and media, information is subject to regular changes

Bad article: Aalten

- Great info box in line with Wikiproject (demographic stats etc.)

- Decent media choices

- Information disjointed and irrelevant to the purpose of the article and WikiProject cities (not much information on the village itself)

- Lacking content for each heading

- Sufficient amount of sources, however, the relevance of each source is limited

- Links to pages that need to be created

- Writing style is unbiased and neutral

- Too specific in its coverage (as opposed to broad)