User:Ecologist-185526/Ecoinformatics/Gopherfrog47 Peer Review

General info
==
 * Whose work are you reviewing?  Ecologist-185526


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ecologist-185526/Ecoinformatics
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ecoinformatics ==

Evaluate the drafted changes
== Overall, super strong draft! The content you added is informative, concise, and in the wikipedia style. However, the way you put the source in each subheading is something I haven't seen before on wikipedia, and the applications section feels out of place, since there is so much more general information you could be including, like the history of ecoinformatics. Besides that, you used sources and hyperlinks very well. My biggest thought would be that the information you cut from the original article, I personally found helpful in understanding the complex topic. Specifically, I would add back the the two paragraphs you cut from the beginning of the lead. While you do have a list of databases, I think the original list is superior in that it spells out the acronyms and uses hyperlinks. Additionally, you cut the original source, but kept the statement it was supporting. This is really a great draft, and the things I'm picking out are super small. ==