User:Ecolstudent123/Regenerative economic theory/Supinecolt44422 Peer Review

General info
Ecolstudent123/Regenerative economic theory
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ecolstudent123/Regenerative economic theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Regenerative economic theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
New/substantially rewritten text:

- What was done well: You added so much!! It looks awesome. I can tell that you put so much effort into this and the information you chose to add was very well informed as well as informative! I learned so much from reading this! I also think the subheading you chose to add information about were very good choices to include.

- Needs work: I am really struggling to find something that needs to be worked on. Maybe a little infographic or some sort of visual aid would be useful to some readers :)

Added citations

- What was done well: Added citations are honestly perfect. You have 5 and they all seem to be reliable sources according to wiki. They are also cited well in your additions to the article.

Connections

- What was done well: Connections are also done very well. They are well used and spread throughout the page. Very informative!

- What needs work: Continuous growth links to economic growth instead of continuous growth. Maybe it is the same thing ... I am not sure but just thought I would let you know!