User:Ecp7201/Bat Creek Inscription/Shuangj Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ecp7201


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ecp7201/Bat Creek Inscription


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bat Creek inscription

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Is everything in the article relevant to this topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Yes, everything is relevant. The second paragraph may be a little bit too long for leading section though, perhaps you can shorten it somehow and makes it more precise.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
The article looks generally neutral to me. It describes facts and doesn't have any biased opinions.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
No there aren't. Up to this point, I can see that it's all about the description of the inscription, the excavations, and the location. The debate has not been edited much yet.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
Yes they do.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that biased noted?
They are supported by references. The informaiton come from Feder's book, two other books, and two websites. They are neutral sources.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing should be added?
No, there aren't. You probably haven't finish editing yet so just keep doing that and should be all good.