User:Ecperault/sandbox

I am a very positive and kind person. I helped Jenna see today so that was pretty cool.

Article Evaluation

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Most of the writing discusses the legends of big foot, not the actual erotica itself but most of it is accurate. Nothing is distracting me.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The site talks about 2010 erotica. There have probably been more monster type erotica published that could be used as an example.

What else could be improved? There could be more details towards the erotica.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is pretty neutral, it would be difficult to make a topic on monster erotic non-neutral. There are none.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There are some things that are underrepresented. I think I could talk a little bit more about the bestiality side of things.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes, they take me straight to other pages of Wiki to see it.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? There are only 4 sources so it isn't very accurate.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are none.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This is not apart of the Wiki project.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? There is no conversation, I need to start one.

How to cite in wiki (Lauren Connolly, 2019): you have a sentence paraphrased, then you click the cite button on the side of the sentence, then go from there; recommended=cite manually not automatically (it is okay if you don't have all of the info needed to source)

Polyamory article potential citation(s):

Being in a polyamorous relationship, everyone involved should be trust worthy and honest. (This cite would be good for the value section where it says cite needed).