User:Ed8795/Temple of the Gadde/Gfs634 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: Lead is brief, which is good, containing a succinct description of what the Temple of the Gadde is in the context of Dura-Europos, referring to the excavation plan schematic and thus situating the temple within the context of its excavation.

First body of content is a great description, written in a neutral tone with citations after nearly every assertion about the temple. ED8795 also includes thorough documentation of the dimensions of both the entire and the discrete parts of the temple complex. There is nothing arguable, it is all solid assertion backed by clear citations.

Description of the relief sculptures is also well-written, again featuring exhaustive, objective descriptions of the different visual aspects of the reliefs. Descriptions of the Reliefs of the Gad of Palmyra and Dura are even more exhaustive, featuring solid description again, this time bolstered by objective visual analysis that makes it easier for the layman reader to ascertain what exactly is significant about each relief.

Article contains helpful hyperlinks throughout, without any repeats. Citations are all clear. Great, well-written, well-researched article. Good job, ED8795!