User:Eddie891/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

July 2020

 * Alex Grant (musician) nominated at AfD; notified 14:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. I don't see any significant coverage that indicates notability outside of Idlewild and Desalvo, so would support a redirect to either of those locations. Isn't notable enough for an article on his own.

August 2020

 * Monkeyman superhero hoax nominated at AfD; notified 12:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Seems to have been an event that got a whole lot of coverage for about a month in May 2003. There is extensive coverage from that time, mostly consisting of long articles in British publications and shorter global articles. See all the coverage I found: The Times (May 3, 2003) The Telegraph (May 25, 2003) South China Morning Press (seems to be the same as a Rueters report, May 7, 2003)The Telegraph, (May 11, 2003). There are a few other dead-links, but that about sums it up. So, back in 2004 this would have seemed to be clearly notable. However, with the benefit of time (16 years of it!) it has become clear that this is not the case. One of the fundamental criteria of an event being considered notable is that it has a lasting effect and a duration of coverage that extends beyond a typical news cycle. Since May 2003, I have found only a BBC 'fun stuff' interview that is dated three weeks after the story, and about a page in New Century, Same Shit: The First Decade, a book that is a satire of the 2000s, not exactly the sort of coverage I would consider indicative of notability. Any other coverage has essentially dried up, from what I found after fairly extensive searching. Somewhat of a borderline case, given the rather in-depth coverage in major UK newspapers, but notable topics have sustained coverage that is beyond just a burst of news coverage, and that does not appear to be the case here.
 * Commedus Interruptus nominated at AfD; notified 13:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: A theater troupe that doesn't seem to have done anything particularly notable, other than have several people who went on to become somewhat notable (mostly as SNL members). The only SIGCOV that I found in a BEFORE search was in the Daily Trojan, a student newspaper for the 	University of Southern California (which this troupe is from), not indicative of any sort of significance, and not a particularly reliable source. The only other coverage is brief mentions in articles about some former members (who are notable for other work). This is nowhere near enough coverage to meet GNG.
 * Philip McHarris nominated at AfD; notified 21:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: While I sympathise with many of the things he advocates for on a personal level, I just don't see how McHarris meets WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALIST. Just having opinion pieces published in well known newspapers doesn't, afaics, make somebody notable unless they have been shown to be widely cited or reviewed. Other than that, I see he has been quoted and/or interviewed for his opinions in several publications, but don't feel that makes him necessarily notable, given that the coverage is about a social issue and not coverage of him. Further, he's not quite at the level of being considered an important or major figure in his field yet, so I'd consider this likely a case where it is rather too soon for him to be notable. It's admittedly a borderline case, so taking to AFD
 * Erskine Oglesby nominated at AfD; notified 22:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG the main source is self-published through Lulu.com, so not reliable. The other sources in the article are passing mentions or don't mention Oglesby at all. On a before search, I found a one paragraph obit and Newspapers.com has a local ad for his performing, and seemingly nothing else besides passing mentions. this suggests there may be more, but the only one of those sources I found is not SIGCOV, as mentioned above. Notability is not conferred just by having played with some famous people, there needs to be covered to back it up, coverage that I just don't see.
 * Winners of major U.S. crossword matches and tournaments nominated at AfD; notified 22:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This topic fails WP:NLIST, because it is not discussed as a group by reliable independent sources, none of these tournaments are enough to make somebody notable as a matter of merely winning, and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Also, 'major' is rather subjective, particularly in a listing of crossword tournaments, there seems to be no clearly defined criteria here.
 * Marklund (not-for-profit) nominated at AfD; notified 13:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Seems a very promotional article that fails WP:NONPROFIT. The only coverage I found was in local papers which do not meet the audience requirements of NONPROFIT. Given that their's quite a bit of coverage from Northern Illinois, I felt an AFD discussion was merited. Tagged for notability since May 2009.
 * Podcasting in Zimbabwe nominated at AfD; notified 14:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This is really an ad for random Zimbabwean podcasts and there's currently nothing worth keeping. There's one linked BBC review of 'The Shona Podcast', but I found nothing else suggesting that podcast was notable. I highly doubt the topic would be notable even if written about podcasting in Zimbabwe, the only good sources I found were a Springer article and a paragraph here, not quite enough.
 * Lance Sigmon nominated at AfD; notified 14:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Lieutenant colonel doesn't meet WP:NSOLDIER, and just being involved in various trials doesn't mean he's notable. The only coverage I found is essentially the same as listed in the article, local papers writing about a former soldier who lost in the primary of an election. I'm not positive about his judge/prosecutorial roles, but cannot find anything beyond the fluff that would suggests they convey notability.
 * Patriot Act, Title III, Subtitle A nominated at AfD 15:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Wow, just wow. This article is a combination of original research, essay, and mostly is only based on primary sources. It is essentially devoid of analysis by secondary sources, and should be deleteed and redirected to Patriot Act, Title III. This is in pretty clear violation of WP:IINFO-- anybody who wants this level of detail is better off just reading the law themselves. See WP:TNT.

September 2020

 * Christian D. Johnston nominated at AfD; notified 00:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: There's an article by a forbes contributor (not reliable), a article in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette which is local coverage about kids who grew up in Pittsburgh-- and is about GLD, not really Johnston, and an ESPN profile (not sigcov). Rest of the coverage reeks of promotionalism or doesn't mention Johnston at all. There is no indication either in the article or on a google search that he meets WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, or WP:NATH.
 * The Hatch nominated at AfD; notified 01:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: A non-notable event. Coverage is limited to local papers, the biggest is a Cleveland sized publication, not enough to indicate notability. It doesn't even seem significant enough seem to a mention at BGSU to me, but opinions may differ there.
 * Maria Nassali nominated at AfD; notified 01:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: While I am painfully cognisant of systematic bias, that is by no means an excuse for a non-notable article to exist. Her books are held in 201 libraries, not very wide at all. Other coverage, like this is passing and of questionable reliability. While she does seem to be decently widely published, I've not found indication that her work is widely covered or impactful enough to convey notability by itself. Otherwise seems to be a fail of WP:NBIO and WP:GNG
 * James Bacon (political aide) nominated at AfD; notified 01:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: So he got a spate of news coverage for being a 23 year old, but it began on February 25, and had essentially dried up by the 26. Since then, there's been silence. This means that WP:NOTNEWS applies, as he's really a minor white house official in a position that, afaik, doesn't convey notability by itself. Seems to also be a case of WP:TOOSOON, as he may become notable in the future. Since the news cycle forgot about him, Bacon has done nothing worthy of note, and there is no indication that he currently is notable.
 * Tiffany Monique nominated at AfD; notified 12:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I don't see coverage to meet WP:GNG, and just being a backup singer for a famous singer, releasing some music (of no note) and being in one documentary doesn't a notable person make, and certainly doesn't make a pass of WP:MUSICBIO. Perhaps a redirect to Beyoncé or 20 Feet From Stardom is in order?
 * Mical nominated at AfD; notified 12:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG, I found no reliable reviews and barely any sourcing at all.
 * Sam Nejabat nominated at AfD; notified 23:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: An unsuccessful political candidate for a minor spot, who had a minor role in a governmental office. No indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Coverage is confined to San Diego publications.
 * Melissa Baker nominated at AfD; notified 00:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I guess this discussion hinges around whether we consider a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model to be de facto notable and meeting WP:NMODEL. I don't, but am not well versed in the field. I found no coverage to suggest that WP:GNG is met, and consensus is divided as to whether SI meets notability by itself. See 1 2 and 3, all from around ten or more years ago. I propose a redirect to List of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue cover models.
 * Vivek Gupta (soldier) nominated at AfD; notified 13:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Another promotional MVC revipient who seemingly fails WP:NSOLDIER and definitely WP:GNG. Also has issues with referencing and tone.
 * Urban Research Program nominated at AfD; notified 14:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I struggled to find any sourcing that would indicate this program is notable. It consists all of namedrops and passing mentions. There are a lot of programs under similar names. For instance, this seems to be a different program than is cited in the article, as does this and this, but none of them seem to meet WP:GNG. THe trove id contains links to promising sources, but all are offline and seem to have been published before 2006 (when this program was allegedly created). This page was redirected to Western Sydney University by, but I am taking to AFD because I found no indication that the program even merits a mention at that university's page (it currently isn't mentioned there at all).
 * List of fatal dog attacks in the United States nominated at AfD; notified 15:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This nom will certainly be controversial, and I think it merits a detailed rationale, so please bear with me. 1) this is in violation of WP:IINFO. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and it is literally a listing of non-notable people who died in a dog attack. 2) Similarly, WP:NOTMEMORIAL applies. None of these people individually meet our notability criteria, and most of them were only covered in local publications. 3) I'm concerned about WP:BLP (which does apply to recently deceased people). There is seemingly no point in listing the names and personal information of non-notable people. See the second paragraph of BLP, which says we must take extra care to have "regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist" 5) WP:NOTNEWS: very few, if any of these events have a lasting notability outside of the 24 hour news cycle 4) I feel that it doesn't meet WP:LISTN We already have Fatal dog attacks, which covers fatal attacks generally, eliminating the need for specialized lists. In reading through the past AFDs, there is clear consensus that the topic of people being killed by dogs is something that is clearly notable. Sources such as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 either agreggate breeds of dogs involved in fatal attacks/other statistics, or pick a random year and use it as a test case to analyse trends in fatal dog attacks. This, admittedly, is great coverage to include in a broad concept article. However, none of them provide a convincing justification to listing every single documented fatal dog attack. This list is just overly massive and a complete list would probably be much longer. Sure, some of these attacks may had hundreds of news articles and the broad-concept of 'dog attacks in the United States' is almost definitely notable, but I see no justification to exhaustively listing every single individual case. I'm sure people will have strong and vastly differing opinions, so will end by saying: let's take extra care to be civil and avoid personal attacks here. We are all here to improve the encyclopedia. Focus on content, not people. Best,
 * Amanda Brinkman nominated at AfD; notified 19:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Potentially controversial, but this should be redirected to Nasty_woman. The best coverage of her is in a relatively local newspaper, otherwise profiles are about the Nasty Woman t-shirt, not her. Her art career doesn't seem to meet WP:NCREATIVE and is maybe even a WP:BLP1E for short term-notability.The vice source, seemingly the most promising source is misleadingly titled, it's actually an op-ed written by her, not about her. Independently fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO, non-notable outside of her association with Nasty woman.
 * Kenya Make a Difference nominated at AfD; notified 13:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Seems to be a non-notable organisation, coverage is solely local and very limited, charity is now defunct so it's not like there's going to be any more. PROD removed because the edit summary didn't clearly suggest it was being prodded and "No longer existing organization there is an active charity organization in Kenya under this name and it is causing a lot of confusion" is not a valid reason for deletion). However, it fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.
 * Jefferson Stein nominated at AfD; notified 20:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: A filmmaker who has directed quite a few non-notable films, his most successful film would have been in the Tribeca Film Festival, but it isn't. No coverage that's indicative of WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE either in the article or on a WP:BEFORE search. Having a film or two what was at a few film festivals and got some views on youtube doesn't a notable filmmaker make.
 * Lisa R. Fredenthal-Lee nominated at AfD; notified 12:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: PROD declined because previously nominated, rationale was Promotional article with no indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Almost no sourcing comes up on a google search, save a single profile in The Press Democrat.
 * Execution of Nathaniel Woods nominated at AfD; notified 14:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Per WP:NOTNEWS, virtually all the national coverage is in early March 2020 (from 5 or 6 March, when he was executed, and from 13 March, when his sister confronted the governor), the other news articles are in local news outlets such as this or in advocacy groups. It's remarkably hard to find coverage before or surrounding the weeks of his execution that would indicate enduring significance and notability. While that may change in the future, Wikipedia cannot keep an article that may become notable at some unspecified time in the future.

October 2020

 * List of Australian rules football junior leagues nominated at AfD; notified 14:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: A list of non-notable organizations, with only one blue link and none of the others having potential to become notable. Fails a few policies, the most relevant being WP:GNG and WP:REDNOT. Has been sitting around in essentially this form since 2006 and while Afd is not cleanup, Wikipedia isn't a respitory of non-notable organisations.
 * Cornelia van Cortlandt nominated at AfD; notified 20:17, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: When I initially came across this article, I got really excited, because I really wanted it to turn out to be notable. However, try as I might, I cannot find any coverage besides "she was the wife of X" "she was the mother of Y" or "she was related to Z", which doesn't make her notable (per WP:NOTGENEALOGY and WP:NOTINHERITED). There's a brief bit of coverage here and here, and similar things across the web, but I'm afraid none of it establishes notability outside of her family. A redirect to Schuyler family seems to be in order. I would be more than happy to be proven wrong.
 * Lloyd Monserratt nominated at AfD; notified 21:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: 2006 AfD closed as no consensus. There's a lot written, but I'm not convinced there's anything notable here. He got a library branch named after him, but I'm afraid there is no notability criteria that says anyone who has this is inherently notable. In fact, the LA Times article I just linked suggests that he got the branch as a memorial to someone who died too soon to really hit their stride (become notable). Neither being a leader at UCLA, a director at NALEO, or chief-of-staff for a councilmember meets NPOL. Coverage cited in the article includes a local obituary (permanent deadlink), Daily Bruin obit (student newspaper, dubious reliability, not indicative of notability), an incredibly short LA Times obit, coverage of him as an activist at UCLA, mostly in passing, small local paper, and similar. A really good source is LA Weekly, but to me that still isn't indicative of more than local notability. Admittedly, it's a borderline case. In summary, this seems to be a case of a person who died too soon to become clearly notable. And that's a real shame.
 * Lebanon Ohio Fifth Third Bank Robbery nominated at AfD; notified 17:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Prod contested with no reasoning. PROD rationale was "Seems to be an event that never got more than local coverage and doesn't meet WP:NEVENT or WP:GNG. Relatively minor robbery without indication of lasting significance.
 * Physics education in the United Kingdom nominated at AfD; notified 14:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: It's not established that this specific topic merits its own article outside of Physics education and Education in the United Kingdom. The only source that goes towards establishing WP:GNG is a blog post, which has iffy reliability. Other sourcing is universities advertising their physics programs, and I mean there's one press release that gives a couple of sentences to physics. I'd expect more to establish notability.
 * Marc Lotenberg nominated at AfD; notified 14:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: The organizations he's led are notable, but I'm seeing no indication of his independent notability.
 * Oh Captain, My Captain nominated at RM; New name: O Captain, My Captain (Grimm) 16:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I think people who search O Captain, My Captain will most likely be looking for the poem "O Captain! My Captain!", a much more popular thing than this episode of a television show. My highly scientific google search and pageviews comparison agrees (this page got 1,401 pageviews in the past month and the Grimm episodes preceding and succeeding it got 333 and 479, respectively). This suggests to me that most people are looking for the Whitman poem and 'Oh Captain, My Captain' should be redirected there with a hat at the top.

November 2020

 * John Christmas (banker) nominated at AfD; notified 19:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: PROD with the rationale Self-Promotion of Non-Notable Person was contested by, contestion was undone but the article is now not eligible for soft deletion. I'm inclined to think coverage as a whistleblower in 2008 makes him a WP:BIO1E, but A) cannot read Latvian and B) it's a really borderline case, because he comes up fairly often in news articles on the crisis. I found passing mentions of his roles in lots of places, but would argue that doesn't substantiate his stand-alone notability.
 * Brian Corsetti nominated at AfD; notified 12:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: PRODded by, with the rationale Fails WP:GNG. Clear WP:PROMO piece. I contested, two 'Emmy's' may make him notable. Merits an AfD discussion.
 * Ram Ray (associate professor) nominated at AfD; notified 22:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Article created and mainspaced and GA reviewed by sock(s), see Sockpuppet investigations/PremierePrush. Notwithstanding that, I don't see a pass of GNG or NPROF here. Associate prof doesn't make one de-facto notable and citations are pretty low, though I'm admittedly not familiar with the field. A google search returns little else indicative of any kind of notability. The first sentence here claims he worked on Soil Moisture Active Passive, but our article on the topic doesn't even mention him.

December 2020

 * Coalition to Support Grieving Students nominated at AfD; notified 15:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Seems to be a fail of WP:NORG. Sourced solely to the website, a search elsewhere turns up a few passing mentions in RS's, mostly books, but no SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG, not to mention the higher bar set by NORG. Seems to have been created by a coi editor (the coalition is led by the National Center for School Crisis and Bereavement and created the article).
 * Sean Walsh (producer) nominated at AfD; notified 12:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Prodded with the rationale fails WP:NOTABLE, but the edit summary did not state the article was being PRODDED, so here we are. I didn't see the sort of coverage to indicate a pass of WP:GNG or I guess WP:NCREATIVE(?), the link in the article that purports to be "Sean Walsh featured in the Sydney Morning Herald" is really just a passing mention of him, which seems to be the best coverage.
 * Arnold Air Society: nominated at AfD; notified 17:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: There's some of verifiable information, but the best coverage I found is the two features in local publications listed in the article-- I don't see enough to merit an article here. Not a reason for deletion, but the article as it stood until I came upon it looked like this for over 12 years-- clearly COI editing that shouldn't be allowed to stick around. There's a vast amount of junk press releases that come up on ProQuest and most of my other databases, so there may be some coverage that I missed.
 * Naval Helicopter Association: nominated at AfD 19:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: The only sourcing I could find was passing mentions and press releases. No indication of meeting GNG, much less WP:NORG.
 * Herbert Wohlfarth: nominated at AfD; notified 20:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: As it turns out this is a procedural nomination, three years in the making- three years late. Contested redirection by . check 's rationale on the talk, Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions. Article copy is uncited or cited to self-published web sites which is not sufficient for notability.No de.wiki article exists. Did not hold a significant command and topped out as Kapitanleutnant. Successful completion of missions is not part of SOLDIER. Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists. I'm not familiar with the reliability of the sourcing, but leaning towards a redirect to List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (W)
 * Sheila Elizabeth Whitton: nominated at AfD; notified 02:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Unfortunately, as she seems to have been a fascinating woman, there's little indication of notability here. My searches didn't find coverage to meet GNG at proquest, newspapers.com, google, gbooks, archive.org, and the Syracuse University library catalogue. I'd love to be proven wrong, however.
 * Harvey Possinger: nominated at AfD; notified 17:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: While he certainly got a lot of awards, and his local obituary claims that he was promised the MoH, he seems to have miraculously avoided getting any non-local coverage that would allow him to meet GNG, as his awards alone aren't quite enough for NSOLDIER or ANYBIO. Unfortunate, because he seems like a hero.
 * Uniform of the day: nominated at AfD; notified 17:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Seems to be a DICDEF with little chance to grow out of it. It is, however, remarkably hard to sort through search and comparable results, so its possible I missed something.
 * Richard L. Cevoli: nominated at AfD; notified 20:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: A hero? Absolutely. Notable? I'm not seeing it. He did have a post office named after him, and a person under his command won the Medal of Honor, but neither of those establish GNG, and I don't think induction into the Rhode Island Aviation Hall of Fame is sufficient by itself. There are one or two articles in The Providence Journal, but I don't think they're enough to substantiate notability on their own.
 * Snowy Evans: nominated at AfD; notified 21:02, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Prod contested. Rationale was: Seemingly "The definition of a bio only notable for one event. I don't see any sigcov establishing GNG."
 * Konstantine Konopisos: nominated at AfD; notified 21:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Meets the letter of NSOLDIER as a rear admiral (though I couldn't verify that), but badly, badly, fails GNG -- to the point that I could barely verify he existed. He seems to have completely avoided getting significant coverage, and the fact that he may have been a rear admiral doesn't change that.
 * George Kalamuri: nominated at AfD; notified 22:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Our article on the Military Medal suggests that over one hundred thousand have been awarded. There's no indication of any other coverage here that establishes notability.
 * Duncan Ronald Gordon Mackay: nominated at AfD; notified 22:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't seem to meet GNG or NSOLDIER. one decent article of coverage, I found no other sigcov that would establish GNG
 * Walter de Washington: nominated at AfD; notified 16:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: PROD with the rational "Does not inherit notability from George Washington, only coverage I found was in genealogies, and it isn't sigcov of him." contested by article creator with the reasoning "No reasonable explanation for proposed deletion." I dispute that assertation-- there's no reasonable answer I've seen as to why this article meets GNG or a relevant SNG.
 * PVT Murphy's Law: nominated at AfD; notified 22:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not seeing the sort of coverage necessary to establish GNG. Best coverage is a passing mention and an article published in Soldiers, a trade journal, titled "PVT Murphy joins the Army", not enough imo.
 * Panna Maria Grays: nominated at AfD; notified 23:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: per my searches and discussion on talk, seems to fail GNG and WP:MILUNIT. Not seeing anything worth keeping or meeting notability here. Clear coi creation (user:SilesiaUSA, article claims to mostly consist of silesians)

January 2021

 * John Roques: nominated at AfD; notified 14:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: PROD with the rationale "Searches on Newspapers.com, Gbooks, Google, Syracuse University Catalogue, ProQuest, bring up nothing approaching significant coverage that is indicative of notability. Leading a drum corps in St. Louis is only notable if its been written about, which I see no indication of" removed without adding sources indicative of notability, so here we are.
 * Joy Lim Arthur: nominated at AfD; notified 16:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I'm not seeing notability here- the best coverage towards GNG is FN #5 in the article, other sourcing includes colleges covering their alumni, induction into the HOF of a region where she worked -- not independent, and not significant enough to lend notability by itself-- an article in a newsletter and a research and development award which doesn't seem to be all that significant. So in summantion, there just isn't enough independent coverage here to establish GNG and none of the awards are significant enough to lend notability (via ANYBIO) by themselves.
 * Federal Virtual World Challenge: nominated at AfD; notified 00:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Prodded with the rationale "Coverage seems to be limited to us army press releases and passing mentions in books published by IGI Global, a questionable publisher at best. Not enough to establish notability, evident coi creator." I missed a prior prod.
 * Alexander Skinner (surgeon): nominated at AfD; notified 02:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not seeing coverage to establish WP:GNG. Simply owning thousands of acres doesn't inherently make one notable-- there are 27.376 million acres in va alone, according to google. Everything I got was he participated in a duel. this provides a decent amount of coverage, but a publisher of coloring books doesn't strike me as a reliable source here. JSTOR suggests an obituary, but it looks more like "local person died" than "a notable person died". Passing mention in  and, but I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources that establishes GNG. PROD contested.
 * Mark Allen Baker: nominated at AfD; notified 23:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I'm genuinely struggling to think over the consistent blatant COI SPA accounts that have been consistently maintaining this article over the past 13 years, but I don't think there's quite enough to meet NAUTHOR. I found a couple of reviews in unremarkable publications. He's done some work, but I'd expect significantly more coverage to establish notability, particularly given that, according to our article, he has published hundreds of articles and over 25 books, drawn considerable attention to his work, has the distinction of being the only person to serve the International Boxing Hall of Fame as an author, historian, chairperson, sponsor, volunteer, and biographer. (I wonder why), his book even hit #1 on Amazon's List of Hot New Releases in Boxer Biographies-the book also hit #1 New Release in Jewish Biographies in December 2017. and don't worry, because he's an active member of the community &c &c &c ...
 * Naval Intelligence Professionals: nominated at AfD; notified 17:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: not seeing NORG met here; coverage includes paragraph here and there, and some press releases and passing mentions. Not to be confused with people who are, in fact, Naval Intelligence Professionals.
 * Weapons and Warfare: nominated at AfD; notified 17:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I found one review,, little else to suggest a pass of NBOOK, though some passing coverage exists. It does seem to be a useful book and is cited a few times in a few places, but I haven't seen indication that it's widely cited enough or covered enough to establish notability.
 * Frances MacKeith: nominated at AfD 17:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I created this page in 2018, but looking back at it I'm not seeing any coverage to establish notability. Obits in The Guardian and The Independent are both written by her daughter, so can't be considered independent, other coverage is either unreliable or local news. Maybe a redirect to her father, but I'm reluctant to redirect non-notable people to other people...
 * Henry A. V. Post: nominated at AfD; notified 16:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: The only coverage I could find was the brief New York Times obit cited in the article, which isn't enough to establish GNG.

February 2021

 * No Crystal Stair: nominated at RM; New name: No Crystal Stair (book) 22:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I think the phrase is much more commonly associated with the poem itself, "Mother to Son", and the line should redirect there. A cursory gsearch agrees with me.
 * Joseph Cotter: nominated at RM; New name: Joseph H. Cotter 23:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not clearly primarytopic, Joseph Cotter (disambiguation) should be at Joseph Cotter. Alternatively could be at Joseph Cotter (politician)
 * Frank Horne: nominated at RM; New name: Frank M. Horne 23:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Frank Smith Horne is at least as likely to be the search term here.

March 2021

 * Unprecedented: A Simple Guide to the Crimes of the Trump Campaign and Presidency: nominated at AfD; notified 17:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I only found two brief reviews, the Kirkus one and the Shepherd Express one-- neither are particularly in-depth or particularly indicative of significance. The project muse entry is not a review. This article feels a lot like an excuse to attack the Trump administration by providing an extensive synopsis. I'd normally be inclined to accept two reviews as meeting WP:NBOOK without question, but considering that this book dates to Feb 2020 it's extremely unlikely there is coverage that isn't online (and I found no more coverage). If that's all the coverage that exists (Kirkus reviews 10,000 books a year according to our article on them, and the Shepherd Express is not particularly major) I find it hard to treat that as establishing notability.
 * Motorcycle Roadracing Association: nominated at AfD; notified 18:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not seeing the kind of WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:NORG. Newspapers.com has (more?) matches for an Edmonton based org, but they are mostly passing.
 * Marc Lotenberg: nominated at AfD; notified 18:05, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Nommed for AFD back in October with the rationale "The organizations he's led are notable, but I'm seeing no indication of his independent notability". No votes were cast. The sole comment was "possibly notable, but there's not a lot of sources out there" (emphasis mine). No indication the situation has changed, renominating-- still fails WP:GNG.
 * MANDRIL: nominated at AfD 17:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Could not find sourcing indicative of notability, a before search for "MANDRIL" "tactical data links" pulled up very little; one book, no newspapers.com results, no reliable sources on my library database, etc.
 * Lars Gyllenhaal: nominated at AfD; notified 14:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: My search found little indicative of notability, save for one review of his book in the Journal of Military History. I asked Ipigott and won't presume to !vote for him, but it seems he found nothing else in Swedish.

May 2021

 * David Thul: nominated at AfD; notified 01:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Search found little that even approached being sigcov in reliable sources, all of which is in the context of the "Appeal for Courage". Not seeing enough to meet WP:GNG or any SNG.
 * War Victims Day: nominated at AfD; notified 02:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Searches did not bring up sufficient coverage to indicate GNG is met. Most is press releases, seems the football game and associated day really haven't caught on...
 * Satronia Smith Hunt: nominated at AfD; notified 02:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I have been completely unable to find sources that provide more to say about this woman than is in this article-- five sentences. Not sigcov to meet GNG by any measure. Perhaps there is an acceptable merge target?
 * Nancy Shakir: nominated at AfD; notified 15:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Failed congressional candidate, search doesn't show she's received sufficient coverage to meet GNG or any relevant SNG

June 2021

 * Sara A. Stires: nominated at AfD; notified 00:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: struggling to see GNG as being met. Award is not sufficient to meet ANYBIO and the sources in the article largely do not offer significant coverage and only mention the subject in passing or don't establish her as notable outside of having served in the military and received a relatively minor award (when considering notability).

July 2021

 * The Pike & Shot Society: nominated at AfD; notified 16:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: PROD contested; searches indicate no notability. As in I can hardly find any coverage

August 2021

 * John (Bam) Ransom: nominated at AfD; notified 19:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Hard to unpack this article, but despite having published in notable publications he doesn't seem to have the coverage to meet WP:GNG

October 2021

 * 2013 Wikipedia Star Trek Into Darkness controversy: nominated at AfD; notified 17:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Seems a case of WP:NOTNEWS, doesn't seem to have had lasting effects or gotten continued coverage beyond a couple weeks in January 2013 and a 2021 paragraph mention in a broader article about Wikipedia edit wars. As far as WP:EVENTCRIT goes, it does not have enduring historical significance, and doesn't seem to even have attracted a lot of coverage at the time. My Before search found little more, the Signpost notes one more contemporary news article (in in the media that is no longer live) and gizmodo gives it a few sentences in 2019, and slate in Feb 2013 gives it a sentence or two. Not enough, IMO to establish notability when considering the above policies.

November 2021

 * Eileen Carragher: nominated at AfD; notified 13:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I found no independent coverage to indicate notability, the article in The Guardian was written by subjects daughter, while death notice in Irish Times is also not independent.

September 2022

 * Beecher's Bible: nominated at AfD; notified 13:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: While it is a well known term, I just don't think there's enough substantial content here for a stand alone article-- the article already feels like it's grasping at straws with the section on the Beecher family. Suggest redirecting somewhere, either to a section in Bleeding Kansas (preferred), Henry Ward Beecher, or Sharps rifle. I would love to see more coverage that I missed be discovered, but I haven't found it.
 * Survivor registry: nominated at AfD; notified 02:38, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Struggling to find sources that discuss the concept of survivor registries as a group, which would indicate notability of the broader category.
 * O'Rahilly's historical model: nominated at AfD; notified 16:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: O'Rahilly's theories may be notable, but this is not the article for it. It simply repeats his theories seemingly like an essay, with little to no encyclopedic content. I think it's time to blow it up and start over, at the very least. I would weakly oppose redirecting to T. F. O'Rahilly as it doesn't seem the title ("O'Rahilly's historical model") has entered scholarly usage outside of Wikipedia, unlikely search term.

October 2022

 * Dheeraj Jindal: nominated at AfD; notified 15:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Procedural renomination, afd at Articles for deletion/Dheeraj Jindal closed as redirect, but two of the three participants have been blocked for socking.
 * I Sing the Body Electric: nominated at RM; New name: I Sing the Body Electric (disambiguation) 14:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Whitman's poem I Sing the Body Electric (poem) would seem to be the primarytopic based on it being the originator of the phrase and a quick gsearch

November 2022

 * David Lerner: nominated at AfD; notified 15:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I fundamentally can't find sigcov outside of the cited introduction to The Spoken Word Revolution Redux that would establish notability. This has me quite confused. Hopefully I'm missing something. If not, seems that there is not enough coverage to establish notability.

December 2022

 * Yes, Virginia: nominated at RM; New name: Yes, Virginia (disambiguation) 16:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: The editorial would seem the primarytopic here

March 2023

 * List of people declared persona non grata: nominated at AfD; notified 15:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: While instances of people being declared persona non grata are covered in the news, and can be included in the articles on (notable) people, I don't see indication that this group list of numerous people as presented here meets NLIST. There seems to be nothing, in this article or in the sources, connecting the different entries or discussing them. While there is some coverage of specific countries or groups of people (ie or, I think the scope of this article, including people from any country or any group, is hopelessly broad.
 * Becky Fischer: nominated at AfD; notified 12:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not finding coverage independent of Jesus Camp-- even the 2011 article I added is follow up from the documentary. Suggest redirection there
 * Hugh Bulkeley: nominated at AfD; notified 14:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Despite the "entry" in the Dictionary of Welsh Biography, I cannot find any significant coverage of this authorthat would establish GNG. Even the DWB provides minimal information, suggesting all we know is "Two poems bearing his name will be found in NLW MS 832E and one in Sotheby MS B2 ." We can't build an encyclopedic article based upon that.
 * Brigitte Secard: nominated at AfD; notified 14:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Despite her admirable efforts beginning at the age of 8 to solve human suffering, Secard seems to have almost entirely avoided receiving in-depth coverage to meet GNG, with the possible exception of one article in an iffy paper that seems to have ceased publication by 2008.

April 2023

 * Tabitha Fringe Chase: nominated at AfD; notified 01:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: A FOIA request and passing mentions over a baggy pants debate don't seem to establish notability.
 * Aostre Johnson: nominated at AfD; notified 01:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not seeing GNG/NPROF here
 * File:Jeremy Dewitte.jpeg: ([ log]) nominated at FfD; notified 23:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: See Media_copyright_questions. Dewitte is a living person, and the image is not so defining that another could not be taken of him to identify him. I don't think this is an correct use of fair use.

October 2023

 * Kit Bigelow: nominated at AfD; notified 02:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Impressive resume, but not finding coverage that would establish GNG here.

November 2023

 * The Knob (New York): nominated at AfD; notified 21:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't seem like there is anything to say about this place. A search turned up quite literally nothing.
 * Indian Chimney Falls: nominated at AfD; notified 15:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Can't find really anything online in reliable sources about this waterfall.

December 2023

 * Joan Richards: nominated at AfD; notified 21:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Despite the award, I can't find any coverage beyond the two sources I added to the article, which by themselves don't seem enough to establish notability, especially because they are concentrated specifically around the awarding. Can't find enough to justify a stand-alone article here.

February 2024

 * US Conference of Chaplains: nominated at AfD; notified 16:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: didn't find sourcing to indicate notability of this org
 * Yamatai (Cornell University): nominated at AfD; notified 02:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: fairly run of the mill Cornell club. Doesn't seem to have gotten coverage to meet NORG.
 * Cornell 100+ MPG Team: nominated at AfD; notified 03:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Briefly entered a competition and got a smattering of coverage for it, but imo was a bit of a flash-in-the pan and there isn't enough coverage here to establish encyclopedic notability. [Should note that I attend Cornell, but have no connection to this project team]
 * Cornell Cup USA: nominated at AfD; notified 13:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: no particular indication of significance/notability here.
 * Cornell Big Red Pep Band: nominated at AfD; notified 13:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Uncited, potentially unciteable. No clear indication of notability here/or of coverage to establish that. [Note that I attend Cornell, have no connection with this org.]
 * Battle of Kutais: nominated at AfD; notified 13:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not finding anything in the sourcing to describe this battle. Admittedly is harder to research something that happened so long ago, but I haven't even been able to verify in an RS that this happened.
 * Sophie Ottaway: nominated at AfD; notified 18:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Coverage is all constrained to a couple week span (implying all derivative of the same coverage, presumably The Telegraph article). See for instance North and South, by the same author. Not indicative of long term notability.
 * Murder of Lisa Dmytrieva: nominated at AfD; notified 19:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: very sad, but coverage (in English) seems wholly confined to a brief span, WP:BIO1E applies.

March 2024

 * 2023 Lakki Marwat operation: nominated at AfD; notified 16:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Hardly an event, possible merge but doesn't seem enough here for a stand alone article.

April 2024

 * Fay Carpenter Swain: nominated at AfD; notified 12:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't seem to have attracted widespread coverage to establish notability beyond the single event of entering in the 1964 Democratic presidential primaries. Suggest redirection to List of female United States presidential and vice presidential candidates.