User:Eddiwong/Crucifixion (Titian)/Carlyroell Peer Review

Lead: Well thought-out and clear introductory paragraph for the painting. No need to change anything here, it is concise.

Content: Maybe add more to history for the painting? This way it adds more background information to the story of the painting.

Tone and balance: Make sure you info added is neutral, unbiased, and factual.

Sources and references: Your references all look good and are included accurately into the paragraphs you added.

Organization: You could just include the different aspects from the painting like the saints and fire into composition. But talking about them separately works too. Overall, the descriptions are concise and organized well. I like how you included the topic of influence into this article.

Images and media: Maybe add more caption to the one titled white specks? Both images enhance the understanding of your topic though.

Overall impressions: You did a really good job overall with the addition of the strong content. Adding more history might enhance and complete this as well.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)