User:Editinglad/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nicola Antonio Stigliola

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I wanted to pick something or someone that I didn't know anything about and I could learn as I edited and have a fresh perspective on the article and subject.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is adequate, but it doesn't summarize the below sections of the article.The first sentence gives a good introduction to Nicola and who he was and what he did and with whom he did it.

the article's content is short but gives a good overview of Nicola and his early studies, but lacks any examples of his artworks or images of himself. The article is lacking on any sections on his later life and work during that time.

The article's tone is relatively balanced and neutral as they are making statements about Nicola and not implying anything with the writing just the information that the writers found on the subject matter.

SOurces

The article is well written and easy to read it flows well and allows anyone to come in and have a basic understanding of Nicola.

The article lacks any image or additional media to show off anything the Nicola did in their life or worked on with others in their life. The article could really use some images to deepen the information in it to show off the artist and painter sides of Nicola.

No Discussions on the article it is low importance.

Overall the article is decent but has spots that it needs improvement. The article has a strong basic summary of Nicola, but it lacks much depth on his life and his work. Overall the article is underdeveloped and needs work in many subjects.