User:Editor190405/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Lucia Rosa

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I read the summary and realized it really caught my eye. This article matters because it portrays a point that woman have a mind of their own. My preliminary impression was that I was shocked when I read the article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

To start, it is not that the lead section is not resourceful and does not give a good overview. It just simply is not good enough. The amount of text inside of this section is very minimal. Although this section is not overly piled with information that is overwhelming. Regarding the content part of the article there is not much content but with the points given, reading it keeps me intrigued and stays on topic. The article is up to date which makes me feel like I can trust the information a bit more. The article is ideally biased. The point of this article was to bring knowledge to the people about women's rights and give them an understanding of the lengths that women would go to so that they could prove their point. The sources stated in this article are current and are indeed accurate to what we are learning. I do believe that with the amount of context given to us they need to do a better job of bringing more sourced to build off of them. I would not say this article was well organized but it does not have spelling errors. There just is not a lot of text to work with and little to no information to go in deeper about what we learned in our one paragraph. There is one image in this article of the very place that the death of Lucia Rosa took place at. This image was very interesting and related to the text, it adhered to Wikipedias copyright regulations too, I just wish there were more. As I tried to look at the talk page about this article I then realized that there was no conversation about this topic. The article is rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article related to what we talk about in class because it shows that women back then did not have much say in what they could do but they still would never back down. The articles overall status is "Stub". The article's strengths is staying on topic. The article can be improved if someone provides more information and back story about Lucia Rosa and why she did what she did. If you just add more information to this article it would be such a more informational article.