User:Editor794/Pot odds/Pinkfrog22 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Editor794


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Pot odds


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pot odds

Evaluate the drafted changes
Example edit made: The added example Editor794 made already is really great. Is is clear, concise, and grammatically correct. Keep up the good work!

Lead

The lead section is a bit too short. What is there already is well cited and well hyperlinked to other wiki pages. Potentially expanding this to mention statistics in general or at least some sort of "where this came from" would help contextualize this a little bit better.

Content

The content is good and written in plain english. However, most of it is uncited. A way to improve this article would be to add in-line citations to the sections at a minimum, if not more than that. It is also quite noticlable that all of the references are from a very small handful of authors. Are there other reputable sources out there that you can find? This would not only help with citations, but also help with the robustness of the article, as previously mentioned in the lead section.

Media

The entire article is a wall of text, which can make it somewhat intimidating to read and comprehend. Would it be possible to include images/simulations/equations or another visual representation to help the reader? This will aid in the comprehension of the numerous examples and also break up the sheer amount of text. It is also difficult to "visualize" equations. For example, " bluff a percentage of the time equal to his opponent's pot odds to call the bluff" is difficult to comprehend into text form. Can you make this into an equation?