User:Editsfordummies/Impact of nanotechnology/AcademicWeapon05 Peer Review

General info
EditsforDummies
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Editsfordummies/Impact of nanotechnology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Impact of nanotechnology

Lead-
At first, I did not thing that there was a lead section due to a "draft" being places above the article. The first sentence of the lead does describe what the article is talking about and EditsforDummies has updated the lead to also match the information added by them. I could not find any information in the lead that was not in the article and the lead is a little over detailed, but I feel as though it does not necessarily affect the article negatively.

Content-
The content supports and furthers the information that was already within the article. From what I can tell the content added is up to date. I really don't know what this article is talking about, but it all sounds the same so I believe that the in formation fits. This article does not relate to one of wikipedias equity gasps, nor does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance-
The content added does not sway toward one side or another, it simply gives the reader information. No viewpoints within the article are under or overrepresented.

Sources and References-
This article has plenty of sources to choose from, when skimming through and looking at the sources, they perceive to be reliable and up to date. The links do in fact work. From what I can see most of the articles were written by several diverse spectrums of authors.

Organization-
The content added could be written a little more professionally and with a better understanding for readers who are not native English speakers, but besides that the content is well organized and does not have any major errors.

Images and Media-
The original article has one video, it explains information on nanotechnology and is well captioned. I have no idea what wikis copyright regulations are sooooo... Its one video, I doesn't really have a way to be visually appealing.

Overall Impressions-
I believe that the content added has in fact improved the quality of this article. The content added contributes new information in the text and just strengthens the ideas of the text as a whole. The only thing that can really be improved id the language, as expressed in organization.