User:Editsfordummies/Impact of nanotechnology/VebraScience Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: Changes to reflect what was added into later sections, but added opinionated detail into negative impact section. Good description and keeps it brief.

Content: Lots of grammatical emphasizing added, some needed to indicate what was being referenced, others less needed and just made the paragraph longer. Does include very relevant details and no gaps in content

Tone and Balance: Besides the instance in the lead, stays relatively unbiased and gives pros and cons to the subject equally.

Sources and References: First reference is not an actual reference and may need to be changed, but other references seem fine.

Organization: Some additions made create too much words per sentence but is overall well organized and easy to read.

Images and Media: N/A

Overall Impressions: Great content added and good tone, some cut backs and sentence edits needed.