User:Edsobcz/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The Big Egg Hunt

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it looked interesting. It's not of very high importance but it does contain information that may be useful to someone for a research project.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article looks good, though it could contain more detail (i.e. saying what day the egg hunt ended as well as what day the egg hunt began). It gives a good overview of the topic without getting too detailed.

The article puts too much focus on the background and doesn't really describe the actual hunt itself (like what people had to do to find the eggs). The background section seems irrelevant.

The sources are good and the links work. I think more sources could be added and more Wikipedia pages could be linked, but right now it's acceptable.

The article could benefit a great deal from more images, considering it's about a hunt for huge Easter egg art pieces.

The article is well-organized overall but has some strange lines, such as the line about the chocolate egg at the egg auction, which seem completely irrelevant.

The article's talk page is dead and offers no insight into the state of the article.

This article overall suffices but is not brilliant by any standard. It could benefit from the addition of more specific information and images.