User:Edstr121/Aluminum cycle/Quovi Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Edstr121, RaineRuthanneWay, JamesTLen


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aluminum_cycle&oldid=1150915950


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Aluminum cycle

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There are some small grammar details, most notably in the lead, that need to be cleaned up. I would also recommend adding more links to other Wikipedia articles. The humans/lithosphere ratio should be specifically defined. The lead should also mention oceanic cycling in some capacity.

The overall content is great, with my only main recommendation being more paragraph breaks between ideas within sections.I would also desire some more detail, but I think the current level is much closer to the scope of the project expected by this class. The tone is very neutral, and there aren't any biased claims or over-represented viewpoints. The pictures added are great and very informative!

I do have some issues with the sources. It looks like most of the information in each paragraph comes from one or two sources, and most of them are at least 20 years old! While I'm sure these were very informative, I wonder if the article wouldn't benefit from more variety in sources and additions from newer research.

I do really enjoy the current organization scheme.

Overall, I think these are valuable contributions to this article, and I especially liked the images and the organization. My main recommendations are mostly small grammar and formatting changes, though slightly more detail and delving into some of the newer research would also be great additions.