User:Educationalpurposes/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Kathleen Hall Jamieson

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because Kathleen Hall Jamieson has a similar profession to the science communicator that I have chosen to write a Wikipedia page about. We have also talked about Kathleen Hall Jamieson in class and her theories, so I am familiar with her work.

Lead section
In the Kathleen Hall Jamieson lead section, a brief background, profession, current job, recent works, and accomplishments are all included. The introductory sentence clearly explains what the rest of the article will be about, and everything noted in the lead section is spoken about in the rest of the article.

Content
The article's content covers all of the subject's notable information; including Jamieson's multiple jobs over the past years, fellowships, and funders. There is also information bout her publications and the awards that these publications have received. Her personal awards for teaching are also included. notably, there is a section about her theoretical contributions that goes into detail about her publications about certain theories.

Tone
This article holds a very neutral tone for the most part, however in the lead section, there is a bias sentence that says "and she is an author, most recently of Cyberwar, and how Russia very likely helped Donald Trump become the US president in 2016." This could have been phrased in a way that says her book exemplified HER beliefs on the subject, rather than stating it as fact.

Organization
This article is very clear, well written with no grammatical errors or typos, and it is well organized.

Images
There are two images in this article, the first is in the beginning to provide a picture of the subject. This is a well-cited and good use of an image. The second image is under publications and awards, and it is another picture of the subject. I think a different image could be used here, possibly one that relates to the publications and awards section more.

Talk page
This is a WikiProject Biography and is rated C-class. There have been two external links modified in the history of this article.

Overall Impressions
This was a good article. it was pretty short, and there were a few wording things that I would change, however it clearly details the subject's notability.