User:Efl4ora/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Lego

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am a fan of LEGO products and I was interested in learning more about their history and nuances as a company.

Lead Section
The lead includes an introductory sentence which presents a concise overview of the product. The lead however, does not include a brief description of all the article's main sections. Overall, the lead section is clear and to the point by giving readers a brief introduction to the article.

Content
Everything in the article appears to be relevant to the topic. I was surprised to learn about the Robotics themes section which was a facet of the company I hadn't heard about prior to evavlutating this article. There was some missing content such as broken links to sources and an excerpt at the bottom of the article which is missing a citation necessary (shown as [citation needed). This article does not address topics related to historical underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone
The article tone is neutral. There are no claims that appear heavily biased. All groups seem to be equally represented, including clone businesses.

Sources and References
The sources support the claims within the article. Most links are active, but some are broken and the citation can no longer be accessed. The sources come from a wide array of authors and publications, however not all sources seem to be entirely reputable.

Talk Page
The conversations on the talk page are both respectful and helpful. There is a small stream of conversation about small changes to the article as well as enhancement suggestions. The article is rated C-class and is a level-4 vital article; Additionally it is of interest on multiple WikiProjects.