User:Efl4ora/Rubber stamp/Mpmill Peer Review

General info
Efl4ora
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Efl4ora/Rubber stamp
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rubber stamp

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The edited version in the sandbox sounds exactly the same as the original, but I think that is sounds neutral and points are made clear. I think in order to make this better, the article can be more concise. There is no bias, considering it is mostly explaining what materials besides rubber can produce a stamp. The language could be changed to make it more accessible for readers because the audience might be people who don't know about rubber stamps.