User:Egalla9/Extreme Weather Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/L06j02 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Egalla9


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Egalla9/Extreme_Weather_Post-Traumatic_Stress_Disorder_%28PTSD%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The introduction is clear and concise, but I think some more detail or background info could be useful in this section to grasp what the article will go into.

Content:

The content is very well put and includes anything I would think would be relevant to the interconnectedness of PTSD and extreme weather events. There is good detail on what extreme weather events and PTSD individually and how they relate to one another. As well as descriptions of the symptoms and solutions. The only thing I would add is maybe dates to understand how things are progressing and when this started becoming a real problem.

Tone and Balance:

The information included is very factual and no opinions influence the content. Well done!

Sources and References:

Sources and references are great and embedded well. There are many sources from different places, which makes it a very reliable article.

Organization:

This article is organized very well. The layout is clear and sections are obvious and easy to understand. The only organization comment I have is about the symptoms section. The headers look almost like they are their own section so maybe unbold those headers or make them a bit smaller to make it more visually appealing.

Overall:

I think this article is great so far and is very close to being finished. Organization is great and all information is easy to understand and relevant to the topic. It is straightforward and seems to be reliable according to the variety of sources. The only part that I think could use work is the case study section. Maybe introduce that section more because it feels like it needs more context.