User:Egalla9/Extreme Weather Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/Pele140646 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Extreme Weather Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Egalla9
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User :Egalla9/Extreme_Weather_Post-Traumatic_Stress_Disorder_%28PTSD%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer Review Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - The lead is concise and discusses the topic of the page however, the sections discussed below are not shown in the lead.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? -Yes so far I see that you've added citations to existing info in the original article; many of the sections are mainly quotes from outside articles so going in depth about the research could add more detail to the sections.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes many of the articles you've added into the article are fairly new (from the 2000's)
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - I think sections about certain mental health disorders besides the three already listed could also be added or just add more to the existing or even links to pre existing wikipedia articles could also be beneficial.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - Yes it does you are addressing that mental health research has focused on high-income countries, excluding vulnerable populations. Low and middle-income countries are more burdened by exposure and vulnerabilities to extreme weather events. This section is very small and I believe it can be discussed more in depth.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? - For the most part yes, even though I think more information should be added to the section explaining the the gap between mental health resources based on income however that would need to stay neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?: Same as listed above, making sure to go more in depth about the mental health differences between economic classes and maybe even going into the stigma of receiving mental health support.

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Some but not all.


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? /Is at least one of them a source from class reading or the "suggested sources" list? If not, can you think of anything we've read that might be useful for them? All 16 sources look good and have diverse information on the topic.
 * Are the sources current? - Yes again you have a broad arrange of articles from the 2000's.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes, it is a mix of journals and websites.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? As stated above just going more in depth on the different articles selected and the sections so some of the sections are more than a couple sentences.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes it easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I think so far everything looks correct. Just continue to read through when editing.


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - Yes it's broken down into sections/general headings and then with specific details.

Overall impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?/How can the content added be improved? - It's a little hard to tell right now, it is definitely a good draft but not at the stage of completion. Everything I have listed above will help get to the final stage of the wikipedia page.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths are the sections of the natural disasters as well as the different types of mental health disorders. Just adding more in depth to those sections.